Go back

The art of the sift

Image: Seattle Municipal Archives [CC BY 2.0], via Flickr

How to select bids when funders restrict the number that each university can submit

One of the most awkward challenges in research development is responding to a ‘restricted’ funding call that only permits a limited number of applications per university. This requires an internal selection process. I’m going to share some of the things I do when I set one up. I don’t have all the answers, and I’d be interested to hear what others do, via Twitter or email or the comments.

This article refers primarily to funding schemes with a hard limit on application numbers. In the UK, that includes the Leverhulme Trust’s major calls and the Academy of Medical Sciences’ Springboard Awards. Some of the suggestions may also be relevant for schemes with a ‘soft’ limit. These typically require universities to have a process to manage demand, submit only their most competitive applications and not support others. There are good arguments for saying that we should be doing this sift anyway, if only to prevent our researchers from wasting time and effort.

This article is only available to Research Professional News subscribers. If you are a subscriber you can read the article in full on researchprofessional.com

Pivot-RP users can log in and view the article via this link.